Town Council
in the council chamber of Hafnarborg
Secretary
- Gudmundur Benediktsson City lawyer
-
General presentations
-
0901062 – Healthcare services, discussions with local authorities on operation
;Guðmundur Rúnar Árnason took the floor and put forward the following motion:“The Hafnarfjörður Town Council agrees to request discussions with the Ministry of Health regarding the future arrangement of healthcare services in Hafnarfjörður. The main points to be emphasised in the discussions are: mso-ansi-language: IS“>
- The future of healthcare in the town, particularly with a view to further integrating healthcare services with other services in the town.<SPAN style=“mso-ansi-language: EN-US“<FONT face=“Times New Roman“
- that the future role of Sólvang can be developed in accordance with the Minister of Health's proposals from 2006 regarding comprehensive geriatric services in Hafnarfjörður
The discussions will also cover the operations of St. Joseph's Hospital and its future.<SPAN style=“COLOR: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US“><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
The Hafnarfjörður Town Council places great emphasis on the fact that all these elements are part of the same overall picture and therefore it is right to discuss them in context. This is how the interests of the town's residents will be best protected, and it is also sensible from a cost-effectiveness perspective. “
Guðmundur Rúnar Árnason (sign) Almar Grímsson (sign)
Jón Páll Hallgrímsson (sign)
Almar Grímsson spoke next, followed by Lúðvík Geirsson.
The town council unanimously approved the proposal with 11 votes.
-
0810239 – Budget for the Municipality of Hafnarfjörður 2009 and three-year plan 2010-2012, second reading
The town council unanimously agreed, by 11 votes, to refer the proposed draft budget for the Borough of Hafnarfjörður for the year 2009 and the three-year plan for 2010-2012 for the operation, operations and finances for a second reading and final disposal at the town council meeting to be held on Wednesday, 7th January.
Ludwig Geirsson took the floor. He put forward the following proposal for a change to salaries:
“The Hafnarfjörður Town Council approves the following proposal for a change to the remuneration of those who serve on the boards, committees and commissions of the Municipality of Hafnarfjörður: In accordance with the rules adopted by the Hafnarfjörður Town Council on 14 September 2006, salaries are reduced by 10% with effect from 1 February 2009. The reference salary will not be adjusted for changes in the public sector salary index but will be reviewed in connection with the preparation of the 2010 budget.
Cost optimisation for the period 1 May 2009 to 31 December 2009: 8 million
The Hafnarfjörður Town Council approves the following proposal to amend the salaries of council employees whose total salary is over 400,000. kr. per month:
· Salary on a scale of 400,000–500,000 króna = 4% reduction
· Salary on a scale of 500,000–600,000 króna = 5.1% reduction
· Salary range of 600,000 - 700,000 króna = 6% reduction
· Salary range of 700,000–800,000 króna = a 7.1% reduction
· Salary on a scale of 800,000 - 900,000 króna = an 8.1% reduction
· Salary on a scale of 900,000–1,000,000 króna = 9% reduction
· Salary over 1 million = 10% reduction
Haraldur Þór Ólason then took the floor. Gunnar Svavarsson made an intervention, to which the speaker replied. Gunnar Svavarsson made a second intervention, to which the speaker also replied. Jón Páll Hallgrímsson then took the floor. Rósa Guðbjartsdóttir made an intervention, to which the speaker replied. Rósa Guðbjartsdóttir made a second intervention. Almar Grímsson took the floor. Lúðvík Geirsson asked a question. Almar Grímsson left the meeting and María Kristín Gylfadóttir took his seat. Haraldur Þór Ólason took the floor. Gunnar Svavarsson asked a question to which the speaker replied. Gunnar Svavarsson made a second intervention, to which the speaker also replied. Jón Páll Hallgrímsson made an intervention, to which the speaker replied. Lúðvík Geirsson made an intervention, to which the speaker replied. Rósa Guðbjartsdóttir took the floor. Gunnar Svavarsson asked a question which the speaker answered. Gunnar Svavarsson asked a second question, to which the speaker also replied. Gunnar Svavarsson made a brief remark. Also Rósa Guðbjartsdóttir. A short break in the meeting. Rósa Guðbjartsdóttir left the meeting. María Kristín Gylfadóttir took her seat. Almar Grímsson returned to the meeting. María Kristín Gylfadóttir took the floor. Then Lúðvík Geirsson. Maria Kristín Gylfadóttir intervened with a point of order, which the speaker answered. Haraldur Þór Ólason left the meeting and was replaced by Skarphéðinn Orri Björnsson. Maria Kristín Gylfadóttir intervened with a point of order for a second time. Gunnar Svavarsson took the floor. Then Skarphéðinn Orri Björnsson. Gunnar Svavarsson made an intervention. The First Deputy Speaker, Guðmundur Rúnar Árnason, took the chair. Ellý Erlingsdóttir took the floor. The Speaker took the chair again. Then Margrét Gauja Magnúsdóttir. María Kristín Gylfadóttir made an intervention to which the speaker replied. Almar Grímsson took the floor and responded to Lúðvík Geirsson. Margrét Gauja Magnúsdóttir took the floor, followed by Almar Grímsson. Gunnar Svavarsson responded. Guðmundur Rúnar Árnason then took the floor and responded to Almar Grímsson. Haraldur Þór Ólason took the floor. Gunnar Svavarsson replied, to which the speaker responded. Gunnar Svavrsson replied. Guðfinna Guðmundsdóttir took the floor. Then Almar Grímsson. Gunnar Svavarsson intervened with a point of order. Haraldur Þór Ólason took the floor. Guðfinna Guðmundsdóttir made a point of order, to which the speaker replied. Margrét Gauja Magnúsdóttir made a point of order. Gísli Ó. Valdimarsson took the floor. Almar Grímsson made a point of order, to which the speaker replied. Almar Grímsson made a second intervention, to which the speaker also replied. Jón Páll Hallgrímsson took the floor. Then Haraldur Þór Ólason. Gísli Ó. Valdimarsson made an intervention. Lúðvík Geirsson took the floor.
A vote was taken:
The A-section's consolidated accounts were approved by 8 votes to 3 abstentions.
The budgets for the general fund and the capital fund were put to the vote separately and passed with 8 votes in favour, 3 abstentions.
The budgets for the Port of Hafnarfjörður, the Hafnarfjörður Sewerage Authority, the Hafnarfjörður Waterworks and the Housing Office were all approved with 8 votes in favour, 3 abstentions.
The consolidated accounts of Parts A and B were approved with 8 votes in favour and 3 abstentions.
The Hafnarfjörður Town Council approved the draft budget for the town treasury of Hafnarfjörður and its institutions, which was presented on 18. December 2008, as amended on 7 January 2009, by 8 votes to 3 abstentions.
The main results for parts A and B are as follows, in thousands of kr.:
Income 12,921,609
Fees 12,475,269
Capital items (210,395)
Annual results 235.945
Assets at year-end
Own funds at year-end 7,308,857
Investments 941.000
Loan facility 2,855,038
<P style=“MARGIN: The Hafnarfjörður Town Council also approved a three-year plan for 2010-2012 with 8 votes in favour and 3 abstentions.
The main results for parts A and B are as follows, in thousands of kr.:
2010 2011 2012
Revenue 13.187.330 13.816.947
Fees 12.293.858 12.312.833
Capital items (680.361) ( 407.140) ( 197.694)
Annual results 213.112 793,338 1,306,420
Assets at year-end 33,048.854 33,063,591 29,390,633
Shareholders“ Equity at Year-End 7.521.969 8.315.307 9,621,727
Investments 235.000 235.000 250.000
Haraldur Þór Ólason made the following statement:
“The budget for 2009 from the Social Democratic Alliance's majority is incomplete and full of uncertainties. This is a direct consequence of the Alliance's reckless financial policy over the last 6 years.
Some key points that are necessary to bear in mind when dealing with this incomplete plan of the Social Democratic Alliance are:
- In the 2008 financial forecast, a capital gain of 6 billion krónur is expected from the town's share in the South-West Geothermal Power Company, but this amount has not yet been paid and there is great uncertainty about the outcome of the matter, which is now before the courts.
- The city's 2009 budget provides for 1 billion króna in interest income from the capital gains. This is a deliberately misleading presentation to beautify the city's accounts by 7 billion króna.
- Since 2003, when the Social Democratic Alliance took over the city's government, debt has increased by 22 billion króna, or has nearly tripled.
- <SPAN style=“LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; FONT-FAMILY: ; FONT-SIZE: 12pt“ lang=IS Roman?? According to the City of Hafnarfjörður's forecast for 2008, the municipality's liabilities increased by 50% year-on-year, or by 13 billion króna, from 21 to 34 billion.
- During the Social Democratic Party's time in government, the municipality's revenues have only been enough to cover its running costs, while construction projects have been financed solely through borrowing.
- In the 2009 budget, no cuts are planned for the town's operations, despite lower revenues.
The municipal administration and governance have expanded in recent years, and the Social Democratic Party has shown a complete lack of foresight in the handling of the town's finances. Thus, during her 6-year term in office, it has been the practice to use the town's profits solely for new projects and operations, while taking out new loans for all capital projects. During this period, the city's debt has increased by 22 billion króna, or 200%, since 2002. The situation now is that the city's debt per resident has reached 1.3 million króna. Hafnarfjörður has thus become one of the most indebted municipalities in the country. In the last year alone, its debts increased by 13 billion króna, or the equivalent of 5,500 króna per day for each family of four in Hafnarfjörður.
The Independence Party has for a long time placed a strong emphasis on simplifying the town's administrative system, both for financial savings and to increase efficiency. The number of the council's departments could be reduced by at least one, for example by merging the Education and Family departments, and the merger of committees could also be considered. Representatives of the Independence Party in the Municipal Council put forward a proposal in December last year that work be undertaken to streamline and simplify the administrative structure of Hafnarfjörður. Furthermore, that the salaries and remuneration of the mayor, councillors, and representatives on boards and committees will be reviewed with the aim of reducing the cost of these expenditure items by up to 15% in 2009. This proposal was never given substantive consideration during the budget process, but was instead shelved by the mayor in a working group.
<SPAN style=“FONT-SIZE: Another key point in the Independence Party's proposals in recent years has been to find ways to save money in operations and through the sale of assets to address the City of Hafnarfjörður's heavy debt position. Thus, in the summer of 2007, we proposed that Hafnarfjörður's stake in the South-West Heat Company (Hitaveita Suðurnesja) be sold at the earliest opportunity. The Social Democratic Party squandered this opportunity, and now there is great uncertainty as to whether it will be possible to realise that significant benefit, amounting to around 8 billion króna. How much will each resident of the municipality owe if that happens?
<SPAN style=“FONT-SIZE: A year ago, the Social Democratic Party announced that 2008 would be the biggest year of construction in the history of Hafnarfjörður, with investments totalling around 6.7 billion króna. Councillors for the Independence Party then warned, as in previous years, against imprudent over-development during periods of expansion and urged caution to ensure there was a buffer for when a recession would hit. That happened as early as the first quarter of 2008, then the great shock came in early October, and now it is clear from the 2009 budget that this is shaping up to be the smallest year for construction in history. Stuck in a debt swamp, the town has no means to create jobs precisely at the time when it is most needed.
<SPAN style=“FONT-SIZE: The majority went to great lengths in December 2007, stating that no new borrowings were planned for 2008, and they clearly intended to carry on relying on the sale of building rights. However, the mayor went ahead and announced a new loan of 3 billion krónur as early as last March, which was many months before any significant plot allocations began. It was interesting to see the mayor basking in the media spotlight for a good loan deal. The sad fact is that these 3 billion have now become 5 billion. In November, a further 2 billion was borrowed, and before that 500 million for sewerage works, but in the final months of the year the cash position became so tight that it was not possible to pay debts to contractors and other creditors.
<SPAN style=“FONT-SIZE: 12pt“The City of Hafnarfjörður is facing a significant reduction in revenue, but the majority coalition's plan is based on incorrect assumptions regarding a 2% increase in revenue, a 3% decrease in employment participation, and 6% unemployment in 2009. Gera a further reduction in income can be taken as a given, beyond that which has been estimated, making it imperative to impose even greater cost-saving measures on the operations of the City of Hafnarfjörður.
<SPAN style=“FONT-SIZE: However, the most serious aspect of the Social Democratic Party's budget is the transfer of capital gains and interest on Hafnarfjörður's stake in the South-West Thermal Power Station to the 2008 revenue forecast. As there is complete uncertainty regarding the outcome of the case between Hafnarfjörður and Orkuveita Reykjavíkur, the booking of the capital gain is merely a feeble attempt to embellish the 2008 results and the 2009 forecast.
The fact is that the 2008 forecast for A and B parts of the municipal fund is actually negative by just over 6.1 billion, and likewise, the outcome for the 2009 budget for A and B parts is negative by almost 800 million króna. This effectively means that Gera will face an additional rationalisation requirement of at least 800 million króna in 2009.
Haraldur Þór Ólason
Almar Grímsson (sign)
Maria Kristin Gylfadottir (sign)
Ludwig Geirsson made the following statement:
“Hafnarfjörður will place primary emphasis on strengthening the well-being of its residents and protecting the municipality's core services in the current special circumstances in the nation's economic and employment affairs. The clear message from the councillors of the Social Democratic Alliance and the Left-Green Party in the adoption of the 2009 budget for Hafnarfjörður is to protect the welfare and services for the town's residents, and on that basis the budget is founded.
In order to achieve those main objectives despite a significant reduction in the town council's income, it will be:
- Positive operating result for the municipal treasury targeted for 2009
- All general service charges in schools and basic services will remain unchanged in nominal terms.
- <SPAN style=“FONT-SIZE: 15% to help with household and business running costs
- Power to increase council tax used to offset a reduction in revenue from property taxes.
All new projects will be fully completed as funding is secured.All new projects will be fully completed as funding becomes available.
- The investment and implementation plan has been revised to date in accordance with the general state of the economy.
- Power to increase council tax used to offset a reduction in revenue from property taxes.
In the assumptions of the budget, m.a. it is projected that the town council's tax revenue will decrease by 5.1% between 2008 and 2009, and the council is estimated to lose approximately 1 billion krónur in 2009 due to lower employment participation and the employment income of residents. In response to this situation, a range of measures have already been implemented to achieve efficiencies and savings, and these have been further pursued in the new financial year
<SPAN style=“COLOR: black; New collective agreements will increase the city's wage costs by 300 million króna in 2009. To offset this wage increase, a saving of 200 million króna is expected in salary and vehicle costs in 2009. This saving will be achieved through a reduction in overtime hours, a change to shift patterns, shorter opening hours for institutions, a reduction in the highest salaries, a reduction in payments to committees and boards, and the termination and amendment of vehicle allowance agreements.
According to the 2009 budget, the operating result for Section A will be a surplus of almost 87 million. kr. in 2009, compared to a surplus of just over 2,341 m.kr. according to the forecast for 2008, partly due to a 6,030 m.kr. capital gain from the sale of shares in Hitaveita Suðurnesja hf.
Operating result for Parts A and B will be a positive 236 million króna in 2009, but will be The operating result for Parts A and B will be a surplus of approximately 236 million króna in 2009, but is forecast to be a surplus of just over 553 million króna for 2008.
Operating cash flow for Sector A in 2009 is estimated at 860 million króna, and the combined total for Sectors A and B reaches 1,617 million króna.
The main objectives in the financial and operational plan of the City of Hafnarfjörður for 2009 will include, among other things:
· Rely on the fundamental pillars of family, school, youth and sports affairs.
· Defend the jobs of general staff.
· To ensure equal status and opportunities for all residents of the town, young and old, to participate and have access to services and social activities.
· Complete the planned new projects, as funding becomes available.
· Strengthen the business community by all available means; including extensive cooperation with the parties to the labour market and support for innovation, idea generation and development work.
· Utilise the human resources available in the municipality through active cooperation between residents, associations, businesses and organisations.
· Place as strong an emphasis as before on consultation and cooperation, both within the town council and with the town's employees, residents and stakeholders, in order to achieve broad consensus on actions and key priorities.
· To ensure the public welfare of the town's residents and to provide support and services to those who require special assistance.
<SPAN style=“COLOR: black; The budget for 2009 is prepared and presented under the special circumstances now prevailing in society following the economic collapse and the bankruptcy of the banking system. A complete turnaround has occurred in the nation's economic and employment life in just a few weeks, and great uncertainty prevails regarding the progress and development of these matters in the coming months and quarters. These circumstances will undoubtedly have an impact on the council's plan as presented here. This situation will be addressed through even more targeted operational and cost monitoring, and regular reviews of the current plan. This will be done, amongst other things, through monthly reports that will be presented to the council's advisory group and the council. Furthermore, the budget will be reviewed for reassessment and revision as circumstances require.
During periods of great pressure in recent years, the internal strength of the administration, staff and elected representatives has been tested. The success of that great work is clear for all to see. Now, this strength and our human resources will be tested even further under completely changed circumstances, where above all, endurance, perseverance, resourcefulness and foresight will be put to the test.
We would like to thank all the staff of the municipality, as well as the elected political representatives and officials in the local authorities throughout the capital region, for their part and involvement in the consultation and cooperation under the special circumstances that currently prevail.
It is vital that the local authorities and elected representatives come together to tackle the major works and projects that lie ahead of us. In this way, we collectively demonstrate the responsibility that has been entrusted to us, and find the paths and solutions for which it is important that there is broad consensus.
<SPAN style=“COLOR: black; The absence of the Independence Party's councillors from all preparatory work and proposal-making in the formulation of the budget has, it is hoped, attracted attention. By their decision to withdraw from these tasks, the party's councillors have shown that they have neither the will nor the interest to shoulder collective responsibility and to show a willingness to cooperate and solidarity in the special circumstances currently prevailing in the community. The town councillors of the Independence Party in Hafnarfjörður are something of an island in this respect, as in all the country's major municipalities a broad consensus was reached on the working methods and the joint involvement of all representatives in the planning process. The cooperation between the Social Democratic and Labour parties in Hafnarfjörður has likewise been built on good collaboration and trust throughout the entire process over the past 10 weeks.
pointless statements by the Independence Party's town councillors regarding the accounting of the town's sale of its stake in the South-West Geothermal Power Station, best describe how poorly informed the party's representatives are, even about their own minutes and resolutions, yet it was only 9 months ago that these same people considered it completely unacceptable that the aforementioned sale was not shown in the town's budget.
The same applies to empty rhetoric regarding the municipality's debt position, which is not least driven by the prevailing exchange rate and fluctuations in the value of the Icelandic króna and inflation. The Independence Party would do well to look more closely at its own record on this matter when it comes to the discussion of responsible economic management over the past decade. Where are the broad lines of the Independence Party's economic and monetary policy now? They are not very apparent. The City of Hafnarfjörður has strengthened and improved both its asset and financial position in recent years, and it is this strength that the city will primarily build upon to tackle the economic challenges now facing the entire nation.
Councillors from the Social Democratic Alliance and the Left-Green Party, like local councillors in all other of the country's largest municipalities, have jointly sought those paths and solutions which they consider both responsible and successful for the interests of the town's residents and the municipality. A proposal that can command broad consensus. The 2009 budget for the City of Hafnarfjörður clearly demonstrates the desire of a large majority of the city council to protect the welfare and interests of the residents, to ensure equality, and to guarantee services for all.
There have certainly been ups and downs in the 100-year history of our town. There have been difficult times and economic struggles, and those hardships have left their mark on the prosperity and social life of the municipality. But we have overcome such difficulties before, and we will do so once again. It is with resilience, courage and boldness that people have faced difficulties on every occasion, and these qualities will continue to be the best remedy.
<P style=“TEXT-INDENT: 0cm; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 6pt“ class=MsoBodyTextIndent3><FONT color=black size=2 face=“Lucida Sans“><SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: ; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt“ lang=NO-BOK Lucida Sans??>Lúðvík Geirsson (sign) </SPAN></FONT><st1:PersonName w_st=“on“><st1:PersonName w_st=“on“><FONT color=black size=2 face=“Lucida Sans“><SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: ; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt“ lang=NO-BOK Lucida Sans??>Ellý Erlingsd</SPAN></FONT></st1:PersonName><FONT color=black size=2 face=“Lucida Sans“><SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: ; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt“ lang=NO-BOK Lucida Sans??>óttir (sign)</SPAN></FONT></st1:PersonName><FONT color=black size=2 face=“Lucida Sans“><SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: ; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt“ lang=NO-BOK Lucida Sans??><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P style=“TEXT-INDENT: 0cm; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 6pt“ class=MsoBodyTextIndent3><st1:PersonName w_st=“on“><FONT color=black size=2 face=“Lucida Sans“><SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: ; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt“ lang=NO-BOK Lucida Sans??>Guðmundur Rúnar Árnason (sign) </SPAN></FONT></st1:PersonName><st1:PersonName w_st=“on“><FONT color=black size=2 face=“Lucida Sans“><SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: ; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt“ lang=NO-BOK Lucida Sans??>Margrét Gauja Magnúsdóttir (sign)</SPAN></FONT></st1:PersonName><FONT color=black size=2 face=“Lucida Sans“><SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: ; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt“ lang=NO-BOK Lucida Sans??><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P style=“TEXT-INDENT: 0cm; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 6pt“ class=MsoBodyTextIndent3><st1:PersonName w_st=“on“><FONT color=black size=2 face=“Lucida Sans“><SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: ; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt“ lang=NO-BOK Lucida Sans??>Guðfinna Guðmundsdóttir (sign) </SPAN></FONT></st1:PersonName><st1:PersonName w_st=“on“><FONT color=black size=2 face=“Lucida Sans“><SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: ; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt“ lang=NO-BOK Lucida Sans??>Gunnar Svavarsson (sign)</SPAN></FONT></st1:PersonName><FONT color=black size=2 face=“Lucida Sans“><SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: ; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt“ lang=NO-BOK Lucida Sans??><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
Gísli Valdimarsson (sign) Jón Páll Hallgrímsson (sign)
Jón Páll Hallgrímsson made the following statement:
“The Left Greens have participated in the work on the budget in good faith and thus taken a responsible stance given the current economic situation. All the main objectives of the plan are in line with the core policies and priorities of the Left-wing Greens.
When we have more room to manoeuvre, we Left Greens will of course press ahead and continue to champion the issues we have campaigned for in every single budget, such as free school meals, free nursery education, increased equality and environmental focus, and so on.
<SPAN style=“FONT-FAMILY: It can be interpreted as irresponsible of the D-list to formally withdraw from the budget process at such a time, and is not in keeping with what is normally the practice in other municipalities, regardless of whether there are right-wing or left-wing majorities there. It is a pity that the D-list was not able to reach a consensus to participate in the work on the budget.
We on the Left-Greens here in Hafnarfjörður do not shy away from the responsibility of contributing to the building of a new society with new priorities.“
Jón Páll Hallgrímsson (sign)
- Positive operating result for the municipal treasury targeted for 2009
-